Blind Judging
Judge entries without seeing who entered. Set blindness per round on AwardKit, hide specific answers from judges, and keep the audience vote anonymous too.
Blind judging removes entrant identity from every judging screen so the work is scored on its own merits. It is one switch per round, nothing to configure beyond that, and it is included in the flat plan.
Turning it on
Open the Judging page, click Edit scoring, and flip the Blind judging tile in Round Options ("Judges score the work without seeing who entered: names, teams, and file names are hidden."; the Blind judging guide link next to its title opens this page). On a multi-round program, the tile reads Blind judging in [round name] and applies to the selected round only; the Edit round dialog (Rename and dates in the round menu) has the same switch, Blind judging in this round.
Because blindness is per round, a blind screening round can feed an open final: the Screening panel never sees names, and the Final jury does. When the round is blind, the collapsed Scoring summary says so ("Blind judging is on: judges score without seeing who entered.").
What judges cannot see
In a blind round, every judging surface for that round:
- Drops entrant names and team members from the entry list, the entry page, and the search index (the search box reads "Search by name or description...").
- Strips the answers to any entry-form question you marked Hide from judges before the page reaches the judge's browser. The organizer's own views are unaffected.
- Masks uploaded file names (entrants routinely put their company name in a file name) while keeping the files viewable.
- Hides the entry summary when the summary question itself is hidden from judges.
Judges see a hint at the top of their dashboard, "Blind judging: entrant identities are hidden.", so a missing name reads as intended rather than as a bug.
Nothing about scoring changes: criteria, weights, picks, recusals, and feedback all work the same way. See Judging interface.
Hiding specific questions
Some questions identify the entrant even when the name is gone (a company website, a LinkedIn profile, "Tell us about your team"). On the entry form, open the question and switch on Hide from judges ("In blind judging rounds, judges never see this answer"). The answer is still collected and visible to you, the gallery, and the public entry page once results are published; only blind rounds strip it.
The audience is blind too
If public voting is on for a blind round, the audience surface is anonymized the same way: no names or teams on the vote page, and the hint reads "Entries are anonymous: entrant identities are hidden." See Voting on entries.
Watch the gallery
Blindness covers the judging and voting surfaces, not your public entry gallery. If gallery visibility is set to After entries close, entrant names are public on the gallery while judging runs, and a judge could look them up. The Blind judging tile shows a warning in that case; set gallery visibility to When results are published to keep the round genuinely blind.
When names come back
Publishing results reveals winners with their names on the results page, the gallery, and certificates as usual. Blindness only ever applied to the judging and voting surfaces, so nothing needs to be undone.
Tips
- Decide before the round opens. Flipping blindness mid-round is allowed, but judges who already opened entries have seen the names.
- Pair blind rounds with recusals: a judge who recognizes a work from the content alone can still declare the conflict.
- Brief entrants. Tell them the screening is blind so they keep identifying details out of the free-text answers you do show judges.
Judging Interface
What judges and audience voters see when evaluating entries on AwardKit. Score criteria sliders, top picks ranking, recusals, blind rounds, and the audience favorites ballot.
Adding Judges
Add judges to your award program on AwardKit, share unique voting links, send email invitations, and track each judge's progress. No account needed for judges.